2006 – 2016

Still Life Investigations and Mythical Art Journeys, pt.2

Levitation Lessons at the Venetian School / 2010 / Oil on canvas / 40" x 60” / Collection of the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art

Based partly on a portion of the interior of the Chiesa dei Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari in Venice, Italy, utilizing a candid reference photo surreptitiously taken on site by the artist in 1995.

Levitation Lessons at the Venetian School is a surrealist painting. It is part of a series of whimsical and mythical art history-related works I have pursued. The paintings and drawings in this series often begin with an actual art history journey I have undertaken, but leads to the representation of something more fanciful –– a mythological quest to an ancient site of classical western art. The series depicts imaginary art history-based quests, investigations, or events.

Levitation Lessons at the Venetian School was inspired by a trip to Italy in 1995 during which I visited the Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari in Venice. This magnificent Gothic cathedral has a red checkerboard tile floor, and its vast interior is partially depicted in my painting. This cathedral is the site of Titian’s 22.5’ high, vertical painting, Assumption of the Virgin (1516-18), which hangs above the altar (obscured behind the columns in my painting). Titian was an artist of the Venetian School of the Italian Renaissance, and his painting imagines, in the words of art historian Frederick Hartt,

“the moment of the Assumption –– the physical ascent into heaven of the Virgin’s body miraculously reunited with her soul after burial –– as a scene of cosmic jubilation.”

She is depicted drifting upward, above a large crowd of earthbound onlookers, and she is surrounded by a swirl of cherubic angels.

The Assumption has been a traditional religious theme for painters to tackle, and I was prompted to consider it as a subject, but I had no interest in executing a religious painting. Desiring a finished painting that would be mysterious, surreal, and poetic, the Assumption subject served as a prompt. Much of my work in this fanciful art history series, and in general, is conceived as a response to classical works, especially artworks of the Italian Renaissance. Specific classical works often are honored, “cited” or “quoted” within the compositions of my drawings and paintings. In addition to art history examples, my artistic influences are also distinctly cinematic. While the Titian painting that served partially as my inspiration is a vertical, towering, crowded masterpiece of formal symmetry, I was interested in a widescreen composition, a more secular ambiguity to the mysterious “vanishing” that I was depicting, and a surrealist juxtaposition of traditional elements (figurative and still life) within a Renaissance interior that offers a very deep, sensual, classical space.

Whimsically, I wondered what a contemporary Assumption of the Virgin (or alien abduction) would look like. It might be partially captured by an amazed bystander’s mobile phone camera, rather awkwardly and just a moment too late. So, the ascending female figure is depicted in the upper left, most of her body having already left the compositional frame.

Only the lower legs and feet remain visible, moving in space, forward and back into the depth of the picture plane, painted in the manner of Renaissance artists who celebrated the spatial properties of carefully modified edges, values, and color intensity. Unlike the typical depiction of the Virgin’s perfect clothing accompanying her skyward, here her material gown or robe is of no heavenly use. So, the rich, heavy drapery succumbs to gravity and drifts downward to earth. Beyond the traditional inherent beauty of classically rendered fabric, here the drapery colors and curvilinear forms additionally evoke fleshy folds and sea shells. And, its edges at right describe an arc that echoes the curvature of the pool of light on the adjacent architectural column. A fabric belt on the gown drifts horizontally to lead the eye from the action on the left toward the vertical stone column on the right. The column’s material treatment and its vertical edge serve to stop the left-to-right eye movement, to anchor the painting with its sheer weight, and –– most importantly –– to contrast sharply with the ethereal or spiritual elements on the left side of the painting.

Ultimately, the orchestration of all of these compositional elements –– some falling, some rising, or levitating and frozen in time –– is a juggling act of things and their meanings on a canvas. It is made possible by the visual vocabulary, science-based aesthetics, painting techniques, and illusionist strategies of Renaissance artists that I studied on my trip to Venice –– hence, the title, Levitation Lessons at the Venetian School.

Robert Bibler, September 11, 2013

Persephone (Homage to Cocteau) / 2015 / Transparent watercolor and pastel pencil on paper / 38.25” x 49.5”

 Inspiration for this painting was derived from Jean Cocteau’s wonderful, surrealist movie, Orpheus, in which the poet Orpheus travels into the underworld.  A dim, shadowy realm of empty streets and decayed passageways, Orpheus and his companion at times make their way by sliding along the surface of ancient stone walls. The painting was executed with the hope that it would be included in the annual Au Naturel International Juried Exhibition at the Royal Nebeker Gallery in Astoria, Oregon.  It was invited into the 2016 exhibit.

Persephone is a figure of Greek myth who was kidnapped from a field of flowers by Pluto, the lord of the Dead, as Sir James George Frazer explains in The Golden Bough.  She is whisked through an abyss in the earth into the underworld “to be Pluto’s bride and queen.”  Eventually, Zeus intervenes to rule that Persephone must reside in the underworld with her husband for one third of each year, but she is allowed to “return year by year when the earth was gay with spring flowers” to the upper world to live for two thirds of each year.  Persephone’s annual change of residence corresponds to the changing seasons of the earth, the cycle of seeds and blossoms, and the annual emergence of plant life.  As Frazer interprets the myth, “…This goddess can surely be nothing else but the mythical embodiment of the vegetation … which is buried under the soil for some months of every winter and comes to life again, as from the grave, in the sprouting cornstalks and the opening flowers and foliage of every spring.”  

In conceiving and executing this figurative watercolor, I wanted to avoid a composition dictated by the shape or outline of the human figure.  By employing a single figure in four different positions simultaneously (in the manner of medieval paintings that depict, for example, the progress of a saint or the stations of the cross), I wanted to suggest the passage of time, an “animated” pivoting movement of the figure, and a choreography of repeated hands––in an S curve––across the surface of the picture plane.  Hands have long been a thematic preoccupation of mine.  The hands in this painting are emphasized by enhanced detail and contrast.  

I was interested in developing a symphonic painting, a work comprised of the harmonic arrangement of several visual movements or rhythms.  First, there is the repeated, rhythmic shape of the female figures and a pattern of diagonals, overlaid with the legato rhythm of pools of light, clouds, and dust, which is integrated with the curvilinear movement of the hands.  These rhythms are all set against a more punctuated or staccato rhythm represented by the stones in the wall.